![]() I can’t think of many reasons why you would want to use online mode, except maybe if you need to make a quick change to a cube and don’t have the time to create a project and deploy the cube. Tabular models are in-memory databases in Analysis Services. ![]() To do this, in Visual Studio go to the menu File -> Open -> Analysis Services Database… -> “Connect to existing database” (or create a new one). I dont see the value on having an OLAP cube AND a PBI model. Any changes you make are made directely to the SSAS database. Conceptually Id think of an Analysis Services Cube or a PBI model as the same (if is AS Tabular they pretty much the same tech) - theyre the semantic layer that predefine relationships, aggregates and other calculation business logic. In this mode, you connect to the cube without saving any local files. There is another feature called “online mode” that you can use if you want to make a change to the SSAS database, but don’t want to create a project. I “reverse engineered” it and got the changes back: when I built the project from the cube on the server I then copied the resulting project files and overwrote the TFS “checked out” files. This feature has also helped me once when I checked out a project from source control, made a bunch of changes, deployed those changes, then accidentally pulled the project again from source control, wiping out my changes. Then enter the name and location to save the new project, and that is all that is too it. Just go into Visual Studio, and from the menu choose File -> New -> Project… -> “Import Analysis Services 2008 Database” (in 2012 it is “Import from Server (Multidimensional and Data Mining)”). Uh oh.įortunately, one great thing about SSAS is you can “reverse engineer” a SSAS database and build the Visual Studio analysis services project from a deployed SSAS database. But his laptop was wiped clean when he left. Further research reveals the developer who you replaced never did check the project into source control, leaving it instead on his laptop. You are asked to add an enhancement to one of the cubes, so you poke around in source control for the Visual Studio analysis services project, but can’t find it. As the products evolve and mature, these factors will certainly get refined.Imagine you join a company, and there is an existing SSAS database that contains a few cubes that are working nicely. Decision Matrix: How to Choose Which Type of Model Meets Your Needs? However, SSAS Multidimensional is a completely different structure - I have no doubt further integration will develop over time. This is a really exciting step forward in the Microsoft BI toolset – one that I’m personally very excited about because it allows Personal BI agility + the ability for a solution to mature over time.Ĭurrently, PowerPivot and SSAS Tabular are similar structures "under the covers" and have a seamless upgrade path. You can think of PowerPivot and SSAS as a graduating lifecycle of tools from Personal BI to Team BI to Corporate BI. In SQL Server 2012, the concept of the BI Semantic Model (BISM) is introduced. So, I created the decision matrix below for the purpose of helping to decide which type of model to create in SQL Server 2012. One thing I wanted was a decision matrix – for a new project, which type of model is most suitable for the requirements I am presented? I wanted thoroughly understand why I might suggest to a client that we create a model other than traditional OLAP. Overview: I’ve been learning about the new features coming out in SQL Server 2012, including Tabular Models & PowerPivot. If you are interested in PowerPivot or Analysis Services, be sure to follow Javier. I need to thank my good friend Javier Guillen ( Blog | Twitter) for proofreading the decision matrix below & providing additional input. OLAP cubes can be considered as the final piece of the puzzle for a data warehousing solution.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |